By Janet Jacobs
Corsicana Daily Sun
They’re hard to miss — the giant postcards that have to be folded over because they’re too large for an average mailbox. Political mailers have been flying fast and furious this season, in time for the Republican primary election Tuesday.
That’s just one reason why there’s so much money invested in these races.
Typically, the bigger the race, the bigger the price tag for the campaign. A presidential race costs upwards of $1 billion, while a U.S. Senate race can cost $10 million or more, and for a big state governor’s race, like the one ongoing in Texas now, will cost $50 million or more.
But at the local level, where the stakes are more modest, the expenses usually reflect that. This District 8 state representative race is unusual in that some serious cash is being spent on it.
It’s accepted wisdom in politics at every level that people already in office will raise more money, partly because of name recognition and partly because people like to bet on a previous winner.
But over the last 12 years, State Rep. Byron Cook’s reserves have built up to nearly at $700,000, with much of it coming from political action committees. Political Action Committees, or PACs, allow individuals to combine their money into large lump sums, giving greater leverage than a bunch of small donations would.
Cook has also gotten money from within the district in the form of dozens of checks from local business people, according to his Ethics Commission Report, and at least one local fundraiser garnered more than $40,000 in an evening.
“I have great support in the district and great support from groups all around the state that appreciate what I’m trying to do,” Cook said. “If you look at mine (finance reports), you’ll see PACs representing tens of thousands of people in the district and around the state — teachers groups, ag groups, Realtors, firefighters’ associations, business groups.”
In the primary race thus far Cook has spent about $217,000 on everything from billboards and signs to those big expensive postcards, and he’s making one last big push right before the election with more ads, mailers and appearances.
What they expect for that money is representation, Cook said.
“The people that support you expect you to go and do a great job doing what’s right for Texas and the district and future generations,” he said. “And remember, all these groups are fully disclosed. It’s the kind of transparency we should have.”
Cook has accused challenger Bobby Vickery of having so-called “dark money” support, coming from groups like Empower Texans and Accountability First.
“Almost 85 percent of my constituents are opposed to dark money,” Cook said. “I think those groups’ involvement is disturbing. Dark money is disturbing because you don’t have the ability to know where that money’s coming from.
“This should be transparent. You have a right to know who’s trying to affect an election,” Cook said.
Vickery denies having the support of “dark money,” or being closely tied to Empower Texans, although he was endorsed by the group, and they did send out an anti-Cook mailer.
“He’s hollering about ‘Empower Texans,’ who’s endorsed me. They’ve mailed out mailers but not on my behalf, just saying (people) need to be informed,” Vickery said. “He’s calling that ‘dark money.’”
Most of the money for Empower Texans comes from Michael Quinn Sullivan, a relatively controversial figure for his anti-public education stance. “They’re a 501(c)3. They haven’t given me any money,” Vickery said. “If you look at my Ethics Commission Report, Empower Texans didn’t give me any money.”
The Young Conservatives of Texas PAC also did an anti-Cook mailer, this one asking voters to support Vickery’s campaign. Vickery claimed that on his financial reports as an in-kind donation. “It was directly mailed for me,” Vickery said.
Another anti-Cook mailer linking Cook to Obamacare was put out by Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, but because it didn’t cite Vickery, he doesn’t have to claim it on his financial report, and didn’t.
Vickery said he’d prefer for the campaign to focus on non-financial report issues, like the closure of the Corsicana Residential Treatment Center, illegal immigration, and the state budget.
“I’d really like to get back to the issues instead of him saying I’m taking dark money,” Vickery said. “What’s fair? Would (Cook) agree to give me half of his money to make the race fair? We have some wonderful people here in Navarro County and I want to represent those people and not the PACs.”
Certainly the lowest-cost campaign is that of Charles Morgan, who’s running for state representative against both Cook and Vickery and who’s raised almost no money and spent only about $2,000 on his campaign, according to his reports with the Texas Ethics Commission.
“I don’t like to ask people for money,” Morgan said. “The other reason is I don’t want to be beholden to any corporation. I can be committed to the people. That’s my personal money, and I’m spending some more.”
As for which groups are supporting whom, Morgan didn’t have any opinions on the Cook/Vickery disputes. His own supporters include the Sierra Club, Public Citizen and the Seed Coalition, although he hasn’t sought any formal endorsements, he said.
“I’m pretty much running this campaign on my own, paying for it myself. I’ll be responsible to the people,” Morgan said.
Closer to home
On a more local level, there are only two contested races on the Republican primary ballot. There are none on the Democratic side.
The race for Navarro County Commissioner for Precinct 2 is between incumbent Commissioner Dick Martin and challenger Leon Tates. Under the finance transparency rules, reports must be submitted 30 days before the election and eight days before the election saying how much was raised, how much was spent, and listing anyone who gave more than $50. Both Tates and Martin were late submitting their eight-day reports, although only by a day or two.
According to Martin’s report, he has raised nearly $6,000 and spent just over $7,000 in his bid for reelection. The difference is money that was left over in his war chest from his last campaign four years ago, Martin said.
Although this time he was an incumbent, Martin said raising the money was just as challenging as when he was a first-timer.
“It wasn’t easy, no, but I have a lot of faithful supporters,” he said.
Most of his money went towards ads in newspapers and magazines, yard signs and charitable donations, as well as a mailout.
The charitable donations that have shown up on expense reports for most of the candidates are for things like silent auction items at the recent Chamber of Commerce banquet, Lord’s Acres auctions and other public events. It helps the charity, it helps the candidates. The money comes from political donations.
Tates’ reports show he’s collected just under $5,000 and spent nearly $8,000.
“Most of the funds had to come from our own pockets,” Tates said. “To run a competitive race I had to contribute my own funds because of how much I wanted that position.”
Fundraising was challenging because he’s running against a sitting opponent, and he’s running as the first African-American on the local Republican ticket, Tates said.
“I can say I didn’t expect some of the obstacles I incurred to happen at this level,” he said. “But I can say overall that the support for me and my family has been unbelievable.”
The race for the GOP nomination for Navarro County Treasurer is between incumbent Frank Hull, and challenger Ryan Douglas.
Hull has received no donations, but has spent just over $2,000, all of his own money, which he loaned to his campaign. He didn’t ask for any help, he said.
“I didn’t ask for any donations. I didn’t solicit any donations, not even from my closest friends,” Hull said. “I funded this whole thing myself. I paid for everything.”
He spent the money on a postcard sent to registered voters, ads in local newspapers and magazines, and signs.
His opponent, challenger Ryan Douglas, got the lion’s share of his donations from family and family friends. He raised about $6,500, and he’s spent just under $5,700. Most of it went for ads, T-shirts, charitable donations, and signs.
“(Fundraising) wasn’t really that hard. They just kind of came in. I didn’t have to go out and seek it,” he said.
That said, the race itself hasn’t been a breeze, Douglas said.
“Stressful is the best word I can find for it,” he said.
By the numbers
Local finance report totals for Navarro County Commissioner, Navarro County Treasurer races, as required by Nov. 24, 2014. Listed in alphabetical order. An (i) indicates an incumbent, or someone already in office. Note, both county commissioners candidates filed their last reports late.
Candidate Race Total contributions Total Expenditures Loans
Ryan Douglas Treasurer $6,513 $5,699 $0
Frank Hull(i) Treasurer $0 $2,060 $2,000
Dick Martin(i) Commissioner $5,845 $7,439 $0
Leon Tates Commissioner $4,874 $7,941 $0
Source: Navarro County Elections office
Finance report totals for State Rep., Dist. 8 race, as of Feb. 24, 2014. Listed in alphabetical order. An (i) indicates the incumbent.
Candidate Total contributions Total Expenditures Reserves Loans
Byron Cook (i) $274,656 $217,446 $693,322 $0
Charles Morgan $50 $2,070 $0 $0
Bobby Vickery $19,154 $14,753 $2,253 $0
Source: Texas Ethics Commission
Janet Jacobs may be reached via email at email@example.com. Want to “soundoff” to this article? Email: Soundoff@corsicanadailysun.com